Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Industrial energy development decouples ungulate migration from the green wave

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 6, pages 1733–1741 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The ability to freely move across the landscape to track the emergence of nutritious spring green-up (termed ‘green-wave surfing’) is key to the foraging strategy of migratory ungulates. Across the vast landscapes traversed by many migratory herds, habitats are being altered by development with unknown consequences for surfing. Using a unique long-term tracking dataset, we found that when energy development occurs within mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) migration corridors, migrating animals become decoupled from the green wave. During the early phases of a coalbed natural gas development, deer synchronized their movements with peak green-up. But faced with increasing disturbance as development expanded, deer altered their movements by holding up at the edge of the gas field and letting the green wave pass them by. Development often modified only a small portion of the migration corridor but had far-reaching effects on behaviour before and after migrating deer encountered it, thus reducing surfing along the entire route by 38.65% over the 14-year study period. Our study suggests that industrial development within migratory corridors can change the behaviour of migrating ungulates and diminish the benefits of migration. Such disruptions to migratory behaviour present a common mechanism whereby corridors become unprofitable and could ultimately be lost on highly developed landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Study area map.
Fig. 2: The influence of development on time spent along segments of the migration route of mule deer in south-central Wyoming, USA.
Fig. 3: Route-level influence of energy development on green-wave surfing by mule deer in south-central Wyoming, USA.
Fig. 4: Migratory movements of mule deer became increasingly mismatched with the green wave over time.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

GPS locations and energy development footprints can be found in the following Dryad Data Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7d7wm37z5. MODIS data are available from the U.S. Geological Survey LP DAAC (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/).

References

  1. Bolger, D. T., Newmark, W. D., Morrison, T. A. & Doak, D. F. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. Ecol. Lett. 11, 63–77 (2008).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fryxell, J. M., Greever, J. & Sinclair, A. R. E. Why are migratory ungulates so abundant. Am. Nat. 131, 781–798 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holdo, R. M., Holt, R. D., Sinclair, A. R., Godley, B. J. & Thirgood, S. in Animal Migration: A Synthesis (eds Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al.) 131–143 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).

  4. Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Middleton, A. D. et al. Conserving transboundary wildlife migrations: recent insights from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 83–91 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aikens, E. O. et al. Wave-like patterns of plant phenology determine ungulate movement tactics. Curr. Biol. 30, 3444–3449 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mueller, T. & Fagan, W. F. Search and navigation in dynamic environments—from individual behaviors to population distributions. Oikos 117, 654–664 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fryxell, J. M. Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. Am. Nat. 138, 478–498 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Drent, R., Ebbinge, B. & Weijand, B. Balancing the energy budgets of arctic-breeding geese throughout the annual cycle: a progress report. Verh. Ornithol. Ges. Bayern 23, 239–264 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. van der Graaf, S. A. J., Stahl, J., Klimkowska, A., Bakker, J. P. & Drent, R. H. Surfing on a green wave—how plant growth drives spring migration in the Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis. Ardea 94, 567–577 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Merkle, J. A. et al. Large herbivores surf waves of green-up during spring. Proc. R. Soc. B. 283, 20160456 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Aikens, E. O. et al. The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 20, 741–750 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Middleton, A. D. et al. Green-wave surfing increases fat gain in a migratory ungulate. Oikos https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.05227 (2018).

  14. Jesmer, B. R. et al. Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals. Science 361, 1023–1025 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sawyer, H. et al. A framework for understanding semi‐permeable barrier effects on migratory ungulates. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 68–78 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kauffman, M. J. et al. Mapping out a future for ungulate migrations. Science 372, 566–569 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Doherty, T. S., Hays, G. C. & Driscoll, D. A. Human disturbance causes widespread disruption of animal movement. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 513–519 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berry, J. Aspects of wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus ecology in the Etosha National Park—a synthesis for future management. Madoqua 1997, 137–148 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Williamson, D. & Williamson, J. Botswana’s fences and the depletion of Kalahari wildlife. Oryx 18, 218–222 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Northrup, J. M. & Wittemyer, G. Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. Ecol. Lett. 16, 112–125 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kauffman, M. J., Meacham, J. E., Sawyer, H., Rudd, W. & Ostlind, E. Wild Migrations: Atlas of Wyoming’s Ungulates (Oregon State Univ. Press, 2018).

  22. Wyckoff, T. B., Sawyer, H., Albeke, S. E., Garman, S. L. & Kauffman, M. J. Evaluating the influence of energy and residential development on the migratory behavior of mule deer. Ecosphere 9, e02113 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lendrum, P. E., Anderson, C. R. Jr., Monteith, K. L., Jenks, J. A. & Bowyer, R. T. Migrating mule deer: effects of anthropogenically altered landscapes. PLoS ONE 8, e64548 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lendrum, P. E., Anderson, C. R. Jr, Long, R. A., Kie, J. G. & Bowyer, R. T. Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural‐gas development. Ecosphere 3, 82 (2012).

  25. Sawyer, H. & Kauffman, M. J. Stopover ecology of a migratory ungulate. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 1078–1087 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sawyer, H., LeBeau, C. W., McDonald, T. L., Xu, W. & Middleton, A. D. All routes are not created equal: an ungulate’s choice of migration route can influence its survival. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 1860–1869 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bischof, R. et al. A migratory northern ungulate in the pursuit of spring: jumping or surfing the green wave? Am. Nat. 180, 407–424 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Skarin, A., Nellemann, C., Rönnegård, L., Sandström, P. & Lundqvist, H. Wind farm construction impacts reindeer migration and movement corridors. Landsc. Ecol. 30, 1527–1540 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mysterud, A., Langvatn, R., Yoccoz, N. G. & Stenseth, N. C. Plant phenology, migration and geographical variation in body weight of a large herbivore: the effect of a variable topography. J. Anim. Ecol. 70, 915–923 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson, H. E. et al. Increases in residential and energy development are associated with reductions in recruitment for a large ungulate. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 578–591 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sawyer, H., Korfanta, N. M., Nielson, R. M., Monteith, K. L. & Strickland, D. Mule deer and energy development—long-term trends of habituation and abundance. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4521–4529 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sawyer, H., Lambert, M. S. & Merkle, J. A. Migratory disturbance thresholds with mule deer and energy development. J. Wildl. Manag. 84, 930–937 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Uezu, A., Metzger, J. P. & Vielliard, J. M. E. Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species. Biol. Conserv. 123, 507–519 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Keeley, A. T. H., Beier, P. & Jenness, J. S. Connectivity metrics for conservation planning and monitoring. Biol. Conserv. 255, 109008 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Abrahms, B. et al. Emerging perspectives on resource tracking and animal movement ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 308–320 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Aikens, E. O. et al. Migration distance and maternal resource allocation determine timing of birth in a large herbivore. Ecology 102, e03334 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Aikens, E. O. et al. Drought reshuffles plant phenology and reduces the foraging benefit of green-wave surfing for a migratory ungulate. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4215–4225 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sawyer, H., Merkle, J. A., Middleton, A. D., Dwinnell, S. P. H. & Monteith, K. L. Migratory plasticity is not ubiquitous among large herbivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 450–460 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schlaepfer, M. A., Runge, M. C. & Sherman, P. W. Ecological and evolutionary traps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 474–480 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Delibes, M., Gaona, P. & Ferreras, P. Effects of an attractive sink leading into maladaptive habitat selection. Am. Nat. 158, 277–285 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sawyer, H., Kauffman, M. J., Nielson, R. M. & Horne, J. S. Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation. Ecol. Appl. 19, 2016–2025 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sawyer, H., Hayes, M., Rudd, B. & Kauffman, M. J. The Red Desert to Hoback Mule Deer Migration Assessment (Univ. Wyoming, 2014).

  43. Berger, J., Young, J. K. & Berger, K. M. Protecting migration corridors: challenges and optimism for Mongolian saiga. PLoS Biol. 6, e165 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sikes, R. S. & Gannon, W. L. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J. Mammal. 92, 235–253 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Vermote, E. MOD09A1 Surface Reflectance 8-day L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006 (NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2015).

  46. Pettorelli, N., Mysterud, A., Yoccoz, N. G., Langvatn, R. & Stenseth, N. C. Importance of climatological downscaling and plant phenology for red deer in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. B. 272, 2357–2364 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Pettorelli, N. et al. Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 503–510 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hamel, S., Garel, M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Gaillard, J. M. & Cote, S. D. Spring normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) predicts annual variation in timing of peak faecal crude protein in mountain ungulates. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 582–589 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Geremia, C. et al. Migrating bison engineer the green wave. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 25707–25713 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Wyoming Game and Fish Department and the U.S. Geological Survey Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative supported this work. Special thanks to: S. L. Garman and J. L. McBeth, US Geological Survey, Geosciences and Environmental Change Science Center who assisted with collection and development of well pad data and to J. A. Merkle who provided derived NDVI and IRG products. GPS collaring was funded by the Bureau of Land Management, Anadarko Petroleum Company, Warren Resources and the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. E.O.A. was supported by the Wyoming NASA Space Grant Consortium Graduate Fellowship (NASA grant no. NNX15AI08H). Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. We thank G. Chong and N. Latysh for feedback that improved earlier versions of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Geological Survey, South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Natural Resource Management, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA

    Ellen O. Aikens

  2. Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA

    Ellen O. Aikens & Teal B. Wyckoff

  3. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA, USA

    Teal B. Wyckoff

  4. Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc., Laramie, WY, USA

    Hall Sawyer

  5. U.S. Geological Survey, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA

    Matthew J. Kauffman

Authors
  1. Ellen O. Aikens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teal B. Wyckoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hall Sawyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew J. Kauffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.O.A., T.B.W., H.S. and M.J.K. conceived the work. H.S. collected the data. E.O.A. and T.B.W. analysed the data. E.O.A., T.B.W. and M.J.K. wrote the manuscript and all authors contributed to revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen O. Aikens.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Like the state (Wyoming Game and Fish Department) and federal (Bureau of Land Management) agencies who supported our research, Anadarko Petroleum Company and Warren Resources helped fund a portion of the study. Neither company had any role in the study design, data interpretation or the preparation of the manuscript. Similarly, H. Sawyer is an employee of Western Ecosystems and, like other co-authors employed by academic institutions, government agencies and NGOs, has no conflict of interest (financial or otherwise) with the study. H. Sawyer collected most of the data, led earlier research efforts in this study system and brought valuable technical expertise to our manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Tim Doherty and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–4, Tables 1–6 and text (SM1).

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aikens, E.O., Wyckoff, T.B., Sawyer, H. et al. Industrial energy development decouples ungulate migration from the green wave. Nat Ecol Evol 6, 1733–1741 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01887-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01887-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing