Skip to main content

Bat Boxes as Roosting Habitat in Urban Centres: ‘Thinking Outside the Box’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Bats

Abstract

Bats in urban environments depend on human-made structures or remnant natural habitats for roosting. Bat boxes are commonly used artificial structures that aim to replace lost tree or building roosts, but they are not a universal solution, or panacea, as few species use them, and other options exist that more closely mimic natural tree cavities. As long-lived mammals, bats may be lured into human-built structures with unstable conditions. These structures could act as ‘ecological traps’ if they suddenly become inaccessible with few other roost options available. Problems arising from the use of bat boxes, such as mortality events resulting from overheating, may reflect limited roost availability rather than inherent flaws in bat box designs. Mimicking a natural roosting area requires accommodating requisite roost switching. This can be accomplished in urban centres by manipulating existing trees or erecting multiple, varied bat boxes in close proximity, which could require purposeful urban planning. Engaging the public in community-driven bat conservation initiatives may hold the key to ensuring bats thrive in human-dominated landscapes. Here, we discuss problems associated with bat boxes and propose solutions, using case studies from Canada and Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2006) Benefits of living in a building: big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in rocks versus buildings. J Mammal 87(2):362–370. https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-127R1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Department of Energy (2013) Energy efficiency and renewable energy. Thermal bypass air barriers in the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code. Building America Solutions Centre, DOE Building Technologies Program PNNL-SA_90573. Available: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/01/f6/4_3d_ba_innov_thermalbypassairbarriers_011713.pdf

  3. Arias M, Gignoux-Wolfsohn S, Kerwin K, Maslo B (2020) Use of artificial roost boxes installed as alternative habitat for bats evicted from buildings. Northeast Nat 27(2):201–214. https://doi.org/10.1656/045.027.0203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rueegger N (2016) Bat boxes—a review of their use and application, past, present and future. Acta Chiropt 18(1):279–299. https://doi.org/10.3161/15081109ACC2016.18.1.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mering ED, Chambers CL (2014) Thinking outside the box: A review of artificial roosts for bats. Wildl Soc Bull 38(4):741-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.461

  6. Tuttle MD (1988) America’s neighborhood bats. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, USA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flaquer C, Puig X, López-Baucells A, Torre I, Freixas L, Mas M, Porres X, Arrizabalaga A (2014) Could overheating turn bat boxes into death traps? Barb 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14709/BarbJ.7.1.2014.08

  8. Griffiths SR, Rhodes M, Parsons S (2021) Overheating turns a bat box into a death trap. Pac Conserv Biol. Published online 23 March 2021. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC20083

  9. Lausen CL, Nagorsen DN, Brigham RM, Hobbs J (2022) Bats of British Columbia, 2nd edn. Royal BC Museum, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kunz TH, Lumsden LF, Fenton MB (2006) Ecology of cavity and foliage roosting bats. In: Kunz TH, Fenton MB (eds) Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 3–89

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis SE (1995) Roost fidelity of bats: a review. J Mammal 76(2):481–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burland TM, Wilmer W (2001) Seeing in the dark: molecular approaches to the study of bat populations. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76(3):389–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793101005747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slough BG, Jung TS (2020) Little brown bats utilize multiple maternity roosts within foraging areas: implications for identifying summer habitat. J Fish Wildl Manag 11(1):311–320. https://doi.org/10.3996/052019-JFWM-039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zahn A (1999) Reproductive success, colony size and roost temperature in attic-dwelling bat Myotis myotis. J Zool 247(2):275–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00991.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2003) Thermoregulation and roost selection by reproductive female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) roosting in rock crevices. J Zool 260(3):235–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903003686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Willis CKR, Brigham RM (2004) Roost switching, roost sharing and social cohesion: forest-dwelling big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, conform to the fission–fusion model. Anim Behav 68(3):495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.08.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Webber QMR, Brigham RM, Park AD, Gillam EH, O’Shea TJ, Willis CKR (2016) Social network characteristics and predicted pathogen transmission in summer colonies of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70(5):701–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2093-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rensel L (2021) Roost selection and social organization of myotis in maternity colonies. Master’s thesis. University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nixon AE, Gruver JC, Barclay RMR (2009) Spatial and temporal patterns of roost use by western long-eared bats (Myotis evotis). Am Midl Nat 162(1):139–147. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-162.1.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Olson CR, Barclay RMR (2013) Concurrent changes in group size and roost use by reproductive female little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). Can J Zool 91(3):149–155. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2012-0267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kerth G, Perony N, Schweitzer F (2011) Bats are able to maintain long-term social relationships despite the high fission–fusion dynamics of their groups. Proc R Soc B 278(1719):2761–2767. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schorr RA, Siemers JL (2021) Population dynamics of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) at summer roosts: apparent survival, fidelity, abundance, and the influence of winter conditions. Ecol Evol 11(12):7427–7438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bondo KJ, Willis CKR, Metheny JD, Kilgour RJ, Gillam EH, Kalcounis-Rueppell MC, Brigham RM (2019) Bats relocate maternity colony after the natural loss of roost trees. J Wild Manag 83(8):1753–1761. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2002) Roosting behaviour and roost selection of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) roosting in rock crevices in southeastern Alberta. Can J Zool 80(6):1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Racey PA (1982) Ecology of bat reproduction. In: Kunz TH (ed) Ecology of bats. Boston, Springer, pp 57–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3421-7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Lourenço SI, Palmeirim JM (2004) Influence of temperature in roost selection by Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Chiroptera): relevance for the design of bat boxes. Biol Conserv 119(2):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pretzlaff I, Kerth G, Dausmann KH (2010) Communally breeding bats use physiological and behavioural adjustments to optimise daily energy expenditure. Naturwissenschaften 97(4):353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0647-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bondarenco A, Körtner G, Geiser F (2014) Hot bats: extreme thermal tolerance in a desert heat wave. Naturwissenschaften 101(8):679–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1202-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Farrell MJ, Studier EH (1970) Fall metabolism in relation to ambient temperatures in three species of Myotis. Comp Biochem Physiol 35(3):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-406X(70)90987-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Willis CKR, Brigham RM (2007) Social thermoregulation exerts more influence than microclimate on forest roost preferences by a cavity-dwelling bat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62(1):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0442-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brittingham MC, Williams LM (2000) Bat boxes as alternative roosts for displaced bat maternity colonies. Wildl Soc Bull 28(1):197–207. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4617303

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tuttle MD, Kiser S, Kiser S (2013) The bat house builder’s handbook, 3rd edn. Bat Conservation International, Austin. Available: https://batweek.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/BHBuildersHdbk13_Online.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stebbings B, Walsh S (1985) Bat boxes: a guide to their history, function, construction and use in the conservation of bats. Flora and Fauna Preservation Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hoeh JPS, Bakken GS, Mitchell WA, O’Keefe JM (2018) In artificial roost comparison, bats show preference for rocket box style. PLoS One 13(10):e0205701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Weier SM, Linden VMG, Grass I, Tscharntke T, Taylor PJ (2019) The use of bat houses as day roosts in macadamia orchards. S Afr PeerJ 7:e6954. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tillman FE, Bakken G, O'Keefe, JM (2021) Design modifications affect bat box temperatures and suitability as maternity habitat. Ecol Solutions Evid 2(4):p.e12112

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pennisi L, Holland S, Stein T (2004) Achieving bat conservation through tourism. J Ecotour 3(3):195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Griffiths SR, Bender R, Godinho LN, Lentini PE, Lumsden LF, Robert KA (2017) Bat boxes are not a silver bullet conservation tool. Mammal Rev 47(4):261–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Johnson JS, Treanor JJ, Slusher AC, Lacki MJ (2019) Buildings provide vital habitat for little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) in a high-elevation landscape. Ecosphere 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2925

  40. Neilson AL, Fenton MB (1994) Responses of little brown myotis to exclusion and to bat houses. Wildl Soc Bull 22(1):8–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3783215

    Google Scholar 

  41. Brigham RM, Fenton MB (1986) The influence of roost closure on the roosting and foraging behaviour of Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Can J Zool 64(5):1128–1133. https://doi.org/10.1139/z86-169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bat Conservation Trust (2015) Living with bats – a guide for roost owners. London, UK. Available: https://cdn.bats.org.uk/uploads/pdf/Living-with-Bats.pdf?v=1541085207

  43. Robertson BA, Hutto RL (2006) A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87(5):1075–1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1075:AFFUET]2.0.CO;2

  44. Speakman JR (1991) The impact of predation by birds on bat populations in the British Isles. Mammal Rev 21(3):123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1991.tb00114.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Threlfall C, Law B, Banks PB (2013) Odour cues influence predation risk at artificial bat roosts in urban bushland. Biol Lett 9(3):20121144. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Oedin M, Brescia F, Millon A, Murphy BP, Palmas P, Woinarski JCZ, Vidal E (2021) Cats Felis catus as a threat to bats worldwide: a review of the evidence. Mammal Rev 51(3). Published online February 15, 2021:mam.12240. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12240

  47. Russo D, Ancillotto L (2015) Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review. Mamm Biol 80(3):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Welch JN, Leppanen C (2017) The threat of invasive species to bats: a review. Mammal Rev 47(4):277–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rueegger N, Goldingay R, Law B, Gonsalves L (2020) Testing multi-chambered bat box designs in a habitat-offset area in eastern Australia: influence of material, colour, size and box host. Pac Conserv Biol 26(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Griffiths SR, Lumsden LF, Bender R, Irvine R, Godinho LN, Visintin C, Eastick DL, Robert KA, Lentini PE (2019) Long-term monitoring suggests bat boxes may alter local bat community structure. Aust Mammal 41(2):273. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM18026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Law B, Eby P, Lunney D, Lumsden L (2011) Biology and conservation of Australasian bats. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 288–296 and 424–442

    Google Scholar 

  52. Griffiths SR, Lumsden LF, Robert KA, Lentini PE (2020) Nest boxes do not cause a shift in bat community composition in an urbanised landscape. Sci Rep 10(1):6210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63003-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Velasco S (2018) Bat box bluff? An investigation into the facilitated dominance of Gould’s wattled bat. Honours thesis. The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lausen CL (2001) Thermoregulation and roost selection by reproductive big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) roosting in the South Saskatchewan River Valley, Alberta: rock-roosting and building-roosting colonies. MSc thesis. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  55. Bideguren GM, López-Baucells A, Puig-Montserrat X, Mas M, Porres X, Flaquer C (2019) Bat boxes and climate change: testing the risk of over-heating in the Mediterranean region. Biodivers Conserv 28(1):21–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1634-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Crawford RD, O’Keefe C (2019) Bat boxes and climate change: testing the risk of over-heating in the Mediterranean region. Biodivers Conserv 28(1):21–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1634-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jung K, Threlfall CG (2018) Trait-dependent tolerance of bats to urbanization: a global meta-analysis. Proc R Soc B 285(1885):20181222. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Fontaine A, Simard A, Dubois B, Dutel J, Elliott KH (2021) Using mounting, orientation, and design to improve bat box thermodynamics in a northern temperate environment. Sci Rep 11(1):7728. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87327-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Griffiths SR, Rowland JA, Briscoe NJ, Lentini PE, Handasyde KA, Lumsden LF, Robert KA (2017) Surface reflectance drives nest box temperature profiles and thermal suitability for target wildlife. PLoS One 12(5):e0176951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Baranauskas K (2007) Bats (Chiroptera) found in bat boxes in southeastern Lithuania. Ekologija 53(4):34–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10043-010-0005-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Gorecki V, Rhodes M, Parsons S (2019) Roost selection in concrete culverts by the large-footed myotis (Myotis macropus) is limited by the availability of microhabitat. Aust J Zool 67(6):281. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO20033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lewis SE (1996) Low roost-site fidelity in pallid bats: associated factors and effect on group stability. Behav Ecol and Sociobiol 39(5):335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lausen CL (2007) Roosting ecology and landscape genetics of prairie bats. PhD dissertation. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mering ED, Chambers CL (2012) Artificial roosts for tree-roosting bats in northern Arizona. Wildl Soc Bull 36(4):765–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Adams J, Roby P, Sewell P, Schwierjohann J, Gumbert M, Brandenburg M (2015) Success of Brandenbark™, an artificial roost structure designed for use by Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis). JASMR 4(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR15010001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Rueegger N (2017) Artificial tree hollow creation for cavity-using wildlife – trialing an alternative method to that of nest boxes. For Ecol Manag 405:404–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Griffiths S, Lentini P, Semmens K, Watson S, Lumsden L, Robert K (2018) Chainsaw-carved cavities better mimic the thermal properties of natural tree hollows than nest boxes and log hollows. Forests 9(5):235. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Kelm DH, Wiesner KR, von Helversen O (2008) Effects of artificial roosts for frugivorous bats on seed dispersal in a neotropical forest pasture mosaic. Conserv Biol 22(3):733–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00925.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Matsuoka S (2008) Use of artificial roosts by Ussuri tube-nosed bats Murina ussuriensis. Bull For For Prod Res Jpn 7(1):9–12. Available: https://www.ffpri.affrc.go.jp/pubs/bulletin/401/documents/406-2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  70. Churchill SK (2009) Australian bats, 2nd edn. Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest, 255pp. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0905/2009286816.html

  71. Bender R (2011) Bat roost boxes at Organ Pipes National Park, Victoria: seasonal and annual usage patterns. In: Law BS, Eby P, Lunney D, Lumsden L (eds) Biology and conservation of Australasian bats. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 443–459

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cori L. Lausen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lausen, C.L. et al. (2022). Bat Boxes as Roosting Habitat in Urban Centres: ‘Thinking Outside the Box’. In: Moretto, L., Coleman, J.L., Davy, C.M., Fenton, M.B., Korine, C., Patriquin, K.J. (eds) Urban Bats. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13173-8_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics