Abstract
Bats in urban environments depend on human-made structures or remnant natural habitats for roosting. Bat boxes are commonly used artificial structures that aim to replace lost tree or building roosts, but they are not a universal solution, or panacea, as few species use them, and other options exist that more closely mimic natural tree cavities. As long-lived mammals, bats may be lured into human-built structures with unstable conditions. These structures could act as ‘ecological traps’ if they suddenly become inaccessible with few other roost options available. Problems arising from the use of bat boxes, such as mortality events resulting from overheating, may reflect limited roost availability rather than inherent flaws in bat box designs. Mimicking a natural roosting area requires accommodating requisite roost switching. This can be accomplished in urban centres by manipulating existing trees or erecting multiple, varied bat boxes in close proximity, which could require purposeful urban planning. Engaging the public in community-driven bat conservation initiatives may hold the key to ensuring bats thrive in human-dominated landscapes. Here, we discuss problems associated with bat boxes and propose solutions, using case studies from Canada and Australia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literature Cited
Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2006) Benefits of living in a building: big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) in rocks versus buildings. J Mammal 87(2):362–370. https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-127R1.1
U.S. Department of Energy (2013) Energy efficiency and renewable energy. Thermal bypass air barriers in the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code. Building America Solutions Centre, DOE Building Technologies Program PNNL-SA_90573. Available: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/01/f6/4_3d_ba_innov_thermalbypassairbarriers_011713.pdf
Arias M, Gignoux-Wolfsohn S, Kerwin K, Maslo B (2020) Use of artificial roost boxes installed as alternative habitat for bats evicted from buildings. Northeast Nat 27(2):201–214. https://doi.org/10.1656/045.027.0203
Rueegger N (2016) Bat boxes—a review of their use and application, past, present and future. Acta Chiropt 18(1):279–299. https://doi.org/10.3161/15081109ACC2016.18.1.017
Mering ED, Chambers CL (2014) Thinking outside the box: A review of artificial roosts for bats. Wildl Soc Bull 38(4):741-751. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.461
Tuttle MD (1988) America’s neighborhood bats. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, USA
Flaquer C, Puig X, López-Baucells A, Torre I, Freixas L, Mas M, Porres X, Arrizabalaga A (2014) Could overheating turn bat boxes into death traps? Barb 7(1). https://doi.org/10.14709/BarbJ.7.1.2014.08
Griffiths SR, Rhodes M, Parsons S (2021) Overheating turns a bat box into a death trap. Pac Conserv Biol. Published online 23 March 2021. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC20083
Lausen CL, Nagorsen DN, Brigham RM, Hobbs J (2022) Bats of British Columbia, 2nd edn. Royal BC Museum, Victoria
Kunz TH, Lumsden LF, Fenton MB (2006) Ecology of cavity and foliage roosting bats. In: Kunz TH, Fenton MB (eds) Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 3–89
Lewis SE (1995) Roost fidelity of bats: a review. J Mammal 76(2):481–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382357
Burland TM, Wilmer W (2001) Seeing in the dark: molecular approaches to the study of bat populations. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76(3):389–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1464793101005747
Slough BG, Jung TS (2020) Little brown bats utilize multiple maternity roosts within foraging areas: implications for identifying summer habitat. J Fish Wildl Manag 11(1):311–320. https://doi.org/10.3996/052019-JFWM-039
Zahn A (1999) Reproductive success, colony size and roost temperature in attic-dwelling bat Myotis myotis. J Zool 247(2):275–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb00991.x
Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2003) Thermoregulation and roost selection by reproductive female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) roosting in rock crevices. J Zool 260(3):235–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836903003686
Willis CKR, Brigham RM (2004) Roost switching, roost sharing and social cohesion: forest-dwelling big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus, conform to the fission–fusion model. Anim Behav 68(3):495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.08.028
Webber QMR, Brigham RM, Park AD, Gillam EH, O’Shea TJ, Willis CKR (2016) Social network characteristics and predicted pathogen transmission in summer colonies of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70(5):701–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2093-3
Rensel L (2021) Roost selection and social organization of myotis in maternity colonies. Master’s thesis. University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
Nixon AE, Gruver JC, Barclay RMR (2009) Spatial and temporal patterns of roost use by western long-eared bats (Myotis evotis). Am Midl Nat 162(1):139–147. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-162.1.139
Olson CR, Barclay RMR (2013) Concurrent changes in group size and roost use by reproductive female little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). Can J Zool 91(3):149–155. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2012-0267
Kerth G, Perony N, Schweitzer F (2011) Bats are able to maintain long-term social relationships despite the high fission–fusion dynamics of their groups. Proc R Soc B 278(1719):2761–2767. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2718
Schorr RA, Siemers JL (2021) Population dynamics of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) at summer roosts: apparent survival, fidelity, abundance, and the influence of winter conditions. Ecol Evol 11(12):7427–7438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7573
Bondo KJ, Willis CKR, Metheny JD, Kilgour RJ, Gillam EH, Kalcounis-Rueppell MC, Brigham RM (2019) Bats relocate maternity colony after the natural loss of roost trees. J Wild Manag 83(8):1753–1761. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21751
Lausen CL, Barclay RMR (2002) Roosting behaviour and roost selection of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) roosting in rock crevices in southeastern Alberta. Can J Zool 80(6):1069–1076. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-086
Racey PA (1982) Ecology of bat reproduction. In: Kunz TH (ed) Ecology of bats. Boston, Springer, pp 57–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3421-7
Lourenço SI, Palmeirim JM (2004) Influence of temperature in roost selection by Pipistrellus pygmaeus (Chiroptera): relevance for the design of bat boxes. Biol Conserv 119(2):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.006
Pretzlaff I, Kerth G, Dausmann KH (2010) Communally breeding bats use physiological and behavioural adjustments to optimise daily energy expenditure. Naturwissenschaften 97(4):353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-010-0647-1
Bondarenco A, Körtner G, Geiser F (2014) Hot bats: extreme thermal tolerance in a desert heat wave. Naturwissenschaften 101(8):679–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-014-1202-2
O’Farrell MJ, Studier EH (1970) Fall metabolism in relation to ambient temperatures in three species of Myotis. Comp Biochem Physiol 35(3):697–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-406X(70)90987-4
Willis CKR, Brigham RM (2007) Social thermoregulation exerts more influence than microclimate on forest roost preferences by a cavity-dwelling bat. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62(1):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0442-y
Brittingham MC, Williams LM (2000) Bat boxes as alternative roosts for displaced bat maternity colonies. Wildl Soc Bull 28(1):197–207. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4617303
Tuttle MD, Kiser S, Kiser S (2013) The bat house builder’s handbook, 3rd edn. Bat Conservation International, Austin. Available: https://batweek.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/BHBuildersHdbk13_Online.pdf
Stebbings B, Walsh S (1985) Bat boxes: a guide to their history, function, construction and use in the conservation of bats. Flora and Fauna Preservation Society, London
Hoeh JPS, Bakken GS, Mitchell WA, O’Keefe JM (2018) In artificial roost comparison, bats show preference for rocket box style. PLoS One 13(10):e0205701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205701
Weier SM, Linden VMG, Grass I, Tscharntke T, Taylor PJ (2019) The use of bat houses as day roosts in macadamia orchards. S Afr PeerJ 7:e6954. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6954
Tillman FE, Bakken G, O'Keefe, JM (2021) Design modifications affect bat box temperatures and suitability as maternity habitat. Ecol Solutions Evid 2(4):p.e12112
Pennisi L, Holland S, Stein T (2004) Achieving bat conservation through tourism. J Ecotour 3(3):195–207
Griffiths SR, Bender R, Godinho LN, Lentini PE, Lumsden LF, Robert KA (2017) Bat boxes are not a silver bullet conservation tool. Mammal Rev 47(4):261–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12097
Johnson JS, Treanor JJ, Slusher AC, Lacki MJ (2019) Buildings provide vital habitat for little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) in a high-elevation landscape. Ecosphere 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2925
Neilson AL, Fenton MB (1994) Responses of little brown myotis to exclusion and to bat houses. Wildl Soc Bull 22(1):8–14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3783215
Brigham RM, Fenton MB (1986) The influence of roost closure on the roosting and foraging behaviour of Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Can J Zool 64(5):1128–1133. https://doi.org/10.1139/z86-169
Bat Conservation Trust (2015) Living with bats – a guide for roost owners. London, UK. Available: https://cdn.bats.org.uk/uploads/pdf/Living-with-Bats.pdf?v=1541085207
Robertson BA, Hutto RL (2006) A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87(5):1075–1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1075:AFFUET]2.0.CO;2
Speakman JR (1991) The impact of predation by birds on bat populations in the British Isles. Mammal Rev 21(3):123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1991.tb00114.x
Threlfall C, Law B, Banks PB (2013) Odour cues influence predation risk at artificial bat roosts in urban bushland. Biol Lett 9(3):20121144. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.1144
Oedin M, Brescia F, Millon A, Murphy BP, Palmas P, Woinarski JCZ, Vidal E (2021) Cats Felis catus as a threat to bats worldwide: a review of the evidence. Mammal Rev 51(3). Published online February 15, 2021:mam.12240. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12240
Russo D, Ancillotto L (2015) Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review. Mamm Biol 80(3):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2014.10.003
Welch JN, Leppanen C (2017) The threat of invasive species to bats: a review. Mammal Rev 47(4):277–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12099
Rueegger N, Goldingay R, Law B, Gonsalves L (2020) Testing multi-chambered bat box designs in a habitat-offset area in eastern Australia: influence of material, colour, size and box host. Pac Conserv Biol 26(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1071/PC18092
Griffiths SR, Lumsden LF, Bender R, Irvine R, Godinho LN, Visintin C, Eastick DL, Robert KA, Lentini PE (2019) Long-term monitoring suggests bat boxes may alter local bat community structure. Aust Mammal 41(2):273. https://doi.org/10.1071/AM18026
Law B, Eby P, Lunney D, Lumsden L (2011) Biology and conservation of Australasian bats. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 288–296 and 424–442
Griffiths SR, Lumsden LF, Robert KA, Lentini PE (2020) Nest boxes do not cause a shift in bat community composition in an urbanised landscape. Sci Rep 10(1):6210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63003-w
Velasco S (2018) Bat box bluff? An investigation into the facilitated dominance of Gould’s wattled bat. Honours thesis. The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Lausen CL (2001) Thermoregulation and roost selection by reproductive big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) roosting in the South Saskatchewan River Valley, Alberta: rock-roosting and building-roosting colonies. MSc thesis. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Bideguren GM, López-Baucells A, Puig-Montserrat X, Mas M, Porres X, Flaquer C (2019) Bat boxes and climate change: testing the risk of over-heating in the Mediterranean region. Biodivers Conserv 28(1):21–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1634-7
Crawford RD, O’Keefe C (2019) Bat boxes and climate change: testing the risk of over-heating in the Mediterranean region. Biodivers Conserv 28(1):21–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1634-7
Jung K, Threlfall CG (2018) Trait-dependent tolerance of bats to urbanization: a global meta-analysis. Proc R Soc B 285(1885):20181222. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1222
Fontaine A, Simard A, Dubois B, Dutel J, Elliott KH (2021) Using mounting, orientation, and design to improve bat box thermodynamics in a northern temperate environment. Sci Rep 11(1):7728. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87327-3
Griffiths SR, Rowland JA, Briscoe NJ, Lentini PE, Handasyde KA, Lumsden LF, Robert KA (2017) Surface reflectance drives nest box temperature profiles and thermal suitability for target wildlife. PLoS One 12(5):e0176951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176951
Baranauskas K (2007) Bats (Chiroptera) found in bat boxes in southeastern Lithuania. Ekologija 53(4):34–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10043-010-0005-8
Gorecki V, Rhodes M, Parsons S (2019) Roost selection in concrete culverts by the large-footed myotis (Myotis macropus) is limited by the availability of microhabitat. Aust J Zool 67(6):281. https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO20033
Lewis SE (1996) Low roost-site fidelity in pallid bats: associated factors and effect on group stability. Behav Ecol and Sociobiol 39(5):335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050298
Lausen CL (2007) Roosting ecology and landscape genetics of prairie bats. PhD dissertation. University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Mering ED, Chambers CL (2012) Artificial roosts for tree-roosting bats in northern Arizona. Wildl Soc Bull 36(4):765–772. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.214
Adams J, Roby P, Sewell P, Schwierjohann J, Gumbert M, Brandenburg M (2015) Success of Brandenbark™, an artificial roost structure designed for use by Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis). JASMR 4(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR15010001
Rueegger N (2017) Artificial tree hollow creation for cavity-using wildlife – trialing an alternative method to that of nest boxes. For Ecol Manag 405:404–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.062
Griffiths S, Lentini P, Semmens K, Watson S, Lumsden L, Robert K (2018) Chainsaw-carved cavities better mimic the thermal properties of natural tree hollows than nest boxes and log hollows. Forests 9(5):235. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050235
Kelm DH, Wiesner KR, von Helversen O (2008) Effects of artificial roosts for frugivorous bats on seed dispersal in a neotropical forest pasture mosaic. Conserv Biol 22(3):733–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00925.x
Matsuoka S (2008) Use of artificial roosts by Ussuri tube-nosed bats Murina ussuriensis. Bull For For Prod Res Jpn 7(1):9–12. Available: https://www.ffpri.affrc.go.jp/pubs/bulletin/401/documents/406-2.pdf
Churchill SK (2009) Australian bats, 2nd edn. Allen and Unwin, Crows Nest, 255pp. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy0905/2009286816.html
Bender R (2011) Bat roost boxes at Organ Pipes National Park, Victoria: seasonal and annual usage patterns. In: Law BS, Eby P, Lunney D, Lumsden L (eds) Biology and conservation of Australasian bats. Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp 443–459
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lausen, C.L. et al. (2022). Bat Boxes as Roosting Habitat in Urban Centres: ‘Thinking Outside the Box’. In: Moretto, L., Coleman, J.L., Davy, C.M., Fenton, M.B., Korine, C., Patriquin, K.J. (eds) Urban Bats. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13173-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13173-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13172-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13173-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)