Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The ten steps to responsible Inland fisheries in practice: reflections from diverse regional case studies around the globe

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inland fisheries make substantial contributions to food security and livelihoods locally, regionally, and globally but their conservation and management have been largely overlooked by policy makers. In an effort to remedy this limited recognition, a cross-sectoral community of scientists, practitioners, and policy makers from around the world convened a high-level meeting in 2015 at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations headquarters in Rome, Italy to develop recommendations for sustainable inland fisheries management. This meeting resulted in the production of the Rome Declaration, outlining ten key steps needed to achieve responsible inland fisheries. When the Ten Steps were conceived, they were framed in a global context because inland fisheries around the world face similar challenges, and it was hoped that these large-scale and ambitious steps would draw the attention of regional or international bodies for greater investment in their proper management. Most inland fisheries, however, are managed at a local (often community, watershed, or waterbody) scale with the “on-the-ground” practitioners, managers, assessment biologists, and stewardship officers responsible for achieving the promise of the Ten Steps. Here, we reflect on the relevance of the Ten Steps to practitioners using six regional case studies from around the globe (North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Africa) to identify the extent to which existing efforts align with the Ten Steps and where there are opportunities to do more. Learning what is effective from local/regional actions should better inform a more global “action plan” and provide tangible guidance for implementation recognizing that global guidance needs to be informed by and acted upon by local practitioners. We conclude by considering the common challenges, synergies, and other emergent properties that arise from these case studies, and use these as a path forward to advancing responsible management of inland fisheries through the Rome Declaration. Of particular importance is the need to balance the high-level aspirational goals of the Ten Steps with the local cultural, socio-economic, and institutional realities that ultimately influence how humans interact with fisheries resources and aquatic ecosystems. This assessment provides valuable information on how to refine and implement the Ten Steps recognizing that success will require coordinated efforts among on-the-ground practitioners, scientists, stakeholders, rightsholders and international decision makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell R, Allan JD, Lehner B (2007) Unlocking the potential of protected areas for freshwaters. Biol Conserv 134(1):48–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AFDB (2019) Malawi—Sustainable Fisheries, Aquaculture Development And Watershed Management Project—Project Appraisal Report. https://www.afdb.org/en/documents/malawi-sustainable-fisheries-aquaculture-development-and-watershed-management-project-project-appraisal-report

  • African Union (2015) Agenda 2063: The AFRICA We Want. “A shared strategic framework for inclusive growth and sustainable development & a global strategy to optimize the use of Africa’s resources for the benefit of all Africans”. Framework Document. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. September 2015

  • Ainsworth RA, Funge‐Smith SJ, Cowx IG (2018) Chapter 10.3: Assessing Inland fisheries at basin level. In: Funge‐Smith SJ (eds), Review of the state of world fishery resources: Inland fisheries. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. C942 Rev. 3. (pp. 317–334). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • Allan JD, Abell R, Hogan ZEB, Revenga C, Taylor BW, Welcomme RL, Winemiller K (2005) Overfishing of inland waters. Bioscience 55(12):1041–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banda M, Jamu D, Njaya F, Makuwila M, Maluwa A (2005) The Chambo restoration strategic plan. WorldFish Centre Conference Proceedings 71

  • Bartley DM, De Graaf GJ, Valbo-Jørgensen J, Marmulla G (2015) Inland capture fisheries: status and data issues. Fish Manage Ecol 22:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner LJ, Finlayson CM (2019) A good plan to help Darling River fish recover exists, so let’s get on with it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/a-good-plan-to-help-darling-river-fish-recover-exists-so-lets-get-on-with-it-110168 (Accessed 2.06.19)

  • Baumgartner LJ, Deng ZD, Ning N, Conallin J, Lynch AJ (2019) Irrigation, fisheries and Sustainable Development Goals: the importance of working collaboratively to end world hunger and malnutrition. Mar Freshw Res 70(9):i–iii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner LJ, Gell P, Thiem JD, Finlayson C, Ning N (2020) Ten complementary measures to assist with environmental watering programs in the Murray–Darling river system, Australia. River Research and Applications rra.3438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3438

  • Beard TD Jr, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, McIntyre PB, de Silva S, Bartley D, Cowx IG (2011) Ecosystem approach to inland fisheries: Research needs and implementation strategies. Biol Let 7:481–483. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benfica R, Thurlow J (2017) Identifying Investment Priorities for Malawian Agriculture. Project Report. https://pim.cgiar.org/files/2017/04/IFPRI-IFAD-PIM-Malawi-Presentation.pdf

  • Biba S (2018) China’s ‘old’ and ‘new’ Mekong River politics: the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation from a comparative benefit-sharing perspective. Water Int 43(5):622–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2018.1474610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogard JR, Hother AL, Saha M, Bose S, Kabir H, Marks GC, Thilsted SH (2015) Inclusion of small indigenous fish improves nutritional quality during the first 1000 days. Food Nutrit Bull 36(3):276–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572115598885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SE, Allison EH, Reynolds JD (2007) Vulnerability of Cambodian water snakes: Initial assessment of the impact of hunting at Tonle Sap Lake. Biol Cons 139(3–4):401–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SE, Allison EH, Gill JA, Reynolds JD (2010) Snake prices and crocodile appetites: aquatic wildlife supply and demand on Tonle Sap Lake. Cambodia Biol Conserv 143(9):2127–2135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos-Silva JV, Peres CA (2016) Community-based management induces rapid recovery of a high-value tropical freshwater fishery. Sci Rep 6:34745. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34745

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho F, Power M, Forsberg BR, Castello L, Martins EG, Freitas CEC (2018) Trophic ecology of Arapaima sp. in a ria lake-river-floodplain transition zone of the Amazon. Ecol Freshw Fish 27:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello L (2004) A method to count pirarucu Arapaima gigas: Fishers, assessment, and management. North Am J Fish Manag 24:379–389. https://doi.org/10.1577/m02-024.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello L (2008) Lateral migration of Arapaima gigas in floodplains of the Amazon. Ecol Freshw Fish 17:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00255.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello L, Viana JPJ, Watkins G, Pinedo-Vasquez M, Luzadis VA (2009) Lessons from integrating fishers of Arapaima in small-scale fisheries management at the Mamirauá Reserve, Amazon. Environ Manage 43:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9220-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castello L, McGrath DG, Beck P (2011a) Resource sustainability in small-scale fisheries in the Lower Amazon. Fish Res 110:35–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello L, Stewart DJ, Arantes CC (2011b) Modeling population dynamics and conservation of arapaima in the Amazon. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 21:623–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-010-9197-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello L, McGrath DG, Hess LL, Coe MT, Lefebvre PA, Petry P et al (2013) The vulnerability of Amazon freshwater ecosystems. Conserv Lett 6(4):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castello L, Arantes CC, McGrath DG, Stewart DJ, Sousa FS (2015) Understanding fishing-induced extinctions in the Amazon. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 25:587–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavole LM, Arantes CC, Castello L (2015) How illegal are tropical small-scale fisheries? An estimate for arapaima in the Amazon. Fish Res 168:1255–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBPTF (Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force) (2019) Phase 1 Report of the Columbia Basin Partnership Task Force of the Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee. NOAA Fisheries and the Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee, Portland, Oregon. Available: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/vision-salmon-and-steelhead-goals-restore-thriving-salmon-and-steelhead-columbia-river-basin

  • Chiwaula LS, Kawiya C, Kambewa PS (2019) Evaluating economic viability of large fish solar tent dryers. Agric Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-019-00416-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collares-Pereira MJ, Cowx IG (2004) The role of catchment scale environmental management in freshwater fish conservation. Fish Manage Ecol 11:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquhoun E (2015) Measuring the economic value of recreational fishing at a national level. Report 2012–214. Canberra, Australia.: http://www.frdc.com.au/Archived-Reports/FRDC Projects/2012–214-DLD.pdf. Accessed 20.06.19.

  • Cooke SJ, Lapointe NWR, Martins EG, Thiem JD, Raby GD, Taylor MK, Beard TD Jr, Cowx IG (2013) Failure to engage the public in issues related to inland fishes and fisheries: strategies for building public and political will to promote meaningful conservation. J Fish Biol 83(4):997–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke SJ, Bartley DM, Beard TD, Cowx IG, Goddard C, Fuentevilla C, Leonard N, Lynch AJ, Lorenzen K, Taylor WW (2016a) From Ideas to Action: Ten Steps to Responsible Inland Fisheries that Support Livelihoods, Food Security, and Healthy Aquatic Ecosystems. In Goddard C, Leonard N, Taylor WW, Bartley D (Eds). Freshwater, Fish, and the Future: Proceedings of the Global Cross-Sectoral Conference. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 343–351.

  • Cooke SJ, Allison EH, Beard TD, Arlinghaus R, Arthington AH, Bartley DM, Cowx IG et al (2016b) On the sustainability of inland fisheries: finding a future for the forgotten. Ambio 45:753–764

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cooperman MS, So N, Arias M, Cochrane TA, Elliott V, Hand T et al (2012) A watershed moment for the Mekong: newly announced community use and conservation areas for the Tonle Sap Lake may boost sustainability of the world’s largest inland fishery. Cambodian J Nat Hist 2012:101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Coordinated Assessments (2018) Coordinated Assessment Five Year Plan. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission-StreamNet and Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership. https://www.streamnet.org/data/coordinated-assessments

  • Cosens BA, Williams MK (2012) Resilience and water governance: adaptive governance in the Columbia River Basin. Ecology and Society 17: 3–17. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art3/. Accessed 9 January 2013.

  • Cowan JJ, Rice JC, Walters CJ, Jilborn R, Essington TE, Day JW, Boswell KM (2012) Challenges for implementing an ecosystem approach to fisheries management. Mar. Coast. Fish. Dyn. Manag. Ecosyst. Sci 4(1):496–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowx IG (2015) Characterisation of inland fisheries in Europe. Fish Manage Ecol 22:78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowx IG, Ogutu-Ohwayo R (2019) Towards sustainable fisheries and aquaculture management in the African Great Lakes. Fish Manage Ecol 26:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton WGR, Castello L, Viana JP (2004) Fisheries in the Amazon várzea: Historical trends, current status, and factors affecting sustainability. In: Silvius K, Bodmer R, Fragoso JMV (eds) People in nature: Wildlife conservation in South and Central America. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, pp 76–95

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • CRITFC (Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission) (2014) Spirit of the Salmon—WY-KAN-USH-MI WA-KISH-WIT. CRITFC, Portland, Oregon, Available CRITFC (Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission).

  • CRITFC (Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission) (2018) Master Plan: Pacific Lamprey Artificial Propagation, Translocation, Restoration, and Research—Conceptual Phase to Address Step 1—Master Plan Review Elements. CRITFC, Portland, Oregon. https://www.critfc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/20180327-Master-Plan-Pac-Lamprey.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2019

  • CRS (Congressional Research Service) (2019) Columbia River Treaty Review, updated June 21, 2019. CRS Report R43287, version 22. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43287.pdf

  • CSIRO (2008) Water availability in the Murray-Darling Basin. Summary of a report from CSIRO to the Australian Government. Canberra: CSIRO. 11 pp. http://www.csiro.au/files/files/pna0.pdf. Accessed 20.06.19.

  • Davies PE, Harris JH, Hillman TJ, Walker KF (2010) The sustainable rivers audit: assessing river ecosystem health in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 61:764–777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies PE, Stewardson MJ, Hillman TJ, Roberts JR, Thoms MC (2012) Sustainable Rivers Audit 2: The ecological health of rivers in the Murray-Darling Basin at the end of the Millennium Drought (2008–2010). Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra.

  • Deines AM, Bunnell DB, Rogers MW, Bennion D, Woelmer W, Sayers MJ, Grimm AG, Shuchman RA, Raymer ZB, Brooks CN, Mychek-Londer JG, Taylor W, Beard TD (2017) The contribution of lakes to global inland fisheries harvest. Front Ecol Environ 15:293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFID (2017) Sector Analysis Studies for the Commercial Agriculture for Smallholders and Agribusiness Programme Malawi—Country Value Chain and Market Analysis Report 10 November 2017. UK Department for International Development.

  • Doran PJ, Medard M, Apsec CD (2017) The 2017 African Great Lakes Conference: Conservation and development in a changing climate. J Great Lakes Res 44:1137–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan P, Delaporte A, Andrew N, O'Keefe M, Welcomme R (2010) Blue harvest: inland fisheries as an ecosystem service. The WorldFish Center Working Papers.

  • Ernst and Young (2011) Economic contribution of recreational fishing in the MDB. Victoria: Department of Primary Industries. 19 pp. http://www.fishingworld.com.au/files/dmfile/EconomicContributionofRecFishingintheMDBFinalReport08_08_20112.pdf. Accessed 20.06.19.

  • Eyler B (2019) Last days of the mighty Mekong. Zed Books Ltd, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2005) Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles. Malawi .Country Profile Fact Sheets. In: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department [online]. Rome. Updated 1 April 2005. [Cited 18 November 2019]. http://www.fao.org/fishery/Government of Malawi. 2018. Annual Economic Report. Malawi.

  • FAO (2015) Voluntary Guidelines for Security Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication. In. Rome: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • FAO (2019) The State of the World’s Aquatic Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture assessments, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2020) Fishery and Aquaculture country profiles: Malawi (2018). Country Profile Fact Sheets [online]. In: FAO Fisheries Division. Rome. Updated 30 October 2020.

  • FAO, MSU (2016) The Rome Declaration: ten steps to responsible inland fisheries. Food and Agriculture Organization and Michigan State University. Rome. http://www.fao.org/inland-fisheries/resources/detail/en/c/1142047/

  • Ferguson JW, Sandford BP, Reagan RE, Gilbreath LG, Meyer EB, Ledgerwood RD, Adams NS (2011) Bypass system modification at Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River improved the survival of juvenile salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 136:1487–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes CC (1997) Lateral migration of fishes in Amazon floodplains. Ecol Freshw Fish 6:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.1997.tb00140.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores L, Mojica J, Fletcher A, Casey P, Christin Z, Armistead C, Batker D (2017) The Value of Natural Capital in the Columbia River Basin: A Comprehensive Analysis. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA. https://secureservercdn.net/104.238.71.140/b63.d34.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ValueNaturalCapitalColumbiaRiverBasinDec2017.pdf

  • Fluet-Chouinard E, Funge-Smith S, McIntyre PB (2018) Global hidden harvest of freshwater fish revealed by household surveys. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:7623–7628

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Funge‐Smith SJ (2018) Review of the state of world fishery resources: inland fisheries. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. C942 Rev. 3. Rome, Italy: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • Funge-Smith S, Bennett A (2019) A fresh look at inland fisheries and their role in food security and livelihoods. Fish Fish 20(6):1176–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginns A (2012) Murray cod- creator of the river. RipRap 34: 42–43. http://australianriverrestorationcentre.com.au/riprap-magazine/. Accessed 20.06.19

  • Government of Malawi (2018) Annual Economic Report. Malawi.

  • Government of Malawi (2016) National Fisheries and Aquaculture Policy. https://www.unpei.org/sites/default/files/event_documents/FISHERIES%20POLICY%20FINAL%2013.11.2012.pdf

  • International Center for Environmental Management (ICEM). MRC Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream: Final Report; ICEM: Hanoi, Vietnam, 2010

  • Isaac VJ, De Almeida MC (2011) El consumo de pescado en la Amazonía brasileña. COPESCAL. Documento Ocasional (13), I

  • Hara M (2011) Community response: Decline of the Chambo in Lake Malawi. In: Jentoft S, Eide A (eds) Poverty mosaics: realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries (pp 251–273). Amsterdam: Springer. Hara M, Jul-Larsen E (2003) The “Lords” of Malombe; An analysis.

  • Harrison J (2018) Columbia River history. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Power and Conservation Council. https://www.nwcouncil.org/reports/columbia-river-history

  • Henry GW, Lyle JM (2003) The National Recreational and Indigenous Fishing Survey. Final Report. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry.

  • Hilborn R (2007) Managing fisheries is managing people: what has been learned? Fish Fish 8(4):285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoggarth DD, Abeyasekera S, Arthur RI, Beddington JR, Burn RW, Halls AS, Kirkwood GP, McAllister M, Medley P, Mees CC, Parkes GB, Pilling GM, Wakeford RC, Welcomme RL (2006) Stock assessment for fishery management—A framework guide to the stock assessment tools of the Fisheries Management Science Programme (FMSP). FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 487. Rome, FAO.

  • Holmlund CM, Hammer M (1999) Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecol Econ 29(2):253–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00015-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HSRG (Hatchery Scientific Review Group) (2009) Columbia River Hatchery Reform System-Wide Report. USA: Hatchery Scientific Review Group, 278 pp. http://www.hatcheryreform.us/hrp/reports/system/welcome_show.action accessed 15 November 2012

  • Hunt LM, Camp E, van Poorten B, Arlinghaus R (2019) Catch and non-catch-related determinants of where anglers fish: a review of three decades of site choice research in recreational fisheries. Rev Fish Sci Aquacult 27(3):261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFR (The Institute for Fisheries Resources) (1996) The Cost of Doing Nothing: The Economic Burden of Salmon Declines in the Columbia River Basin. Report No. 1 of 3, October 1996. Eugene, Oregon: The Institute for Fisheries Resources, Northwest Regional Office. Available https://pcffa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/CDNReport-Columbia.pdf

  • IFReDI 2012: Food and nutrition security vulnerability to mainstream hydropower dam development in Cambodia. Synthesis report of the FiA/Danida/WWF/Oxfam project “Food and nutrition security vulnerability to mainstream hydropower dam development in Cambodia”. Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute, Fisheries Administration, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. 44 pp.

  • Intralawan A, Wood D, Frankel R, Costanza R, Kubiszewski I (2018) Tradeoff analysis between electricity generation and ecosystem services in the Lower Mekong Basin. Ecosyst Serv 30:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine K, Etiegni CA, Weyl OLF (2019) Prognosis for long-term sustainable fisheries in the African Great Lakes. Fish Manage Ecol 26:413–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISAB (Independent Science Advisory Board) (2018) Review of the Comparative Survival Study (CSS) Draft 2018 Annual Report. Portland, Oregon, Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Available: https://www.nwcouncil.org/fish-and-wildlife/project-reviews-and-recommendations

  • ISAB (Independent Science Advisory Board) (2019) A review of predation impacts and management effectiveness for the Columbia River Basin. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Power and Conservation Council. https://www.nwcouncil.org/isab2019-1

  • ISAB (Independent Scientific Advisory Board) (2011) Using a Comprehensive Landscape Approach for More Effective Conservation and Restoration. Document Number ISAB 2011–4. Portland, OR: Northwest Power and Conservation Council, 191 pp. http://www.nwcouncil.org/library/report.asp?d=640 accessed 15 November 2012

  • ISRP (Independent Science Review Panel) (2018) 2018 Research Projects: Progress Review. Portland, Oregon, Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Available: https://www.nwcouncil.org/fish-and-wildlife/project-reviews-and-recommendations

  • Jacobsen L, Berg S, Skov C (2004) Management of lake fish populations and lake fisheries in Denmark: history and current status. Fish Manage Ecol 11:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson AL, Lynch AJ, Thiem JD et al (2021) A bright spot analysis of inland recreational fisheries in the face of climate change: learning about adaptation from small successes. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 31:181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-021-09638-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S (2014) Walking the talk: Implementing the international voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. Maritime Stud 13(1):16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R, Barragán-Paladines MJ, Franz N (2017) The small-scale fisheries guidelines: global implementation. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Staff Report (Joint Columbia River Management Staff; Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife; Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife) (2018) 2018 Joint Staff Report: Stock Status and Fisheries for Fall Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon, Chum Salmon, Summer Steelhead, and White Sturgeon. https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/02005/wdfw02005.pdf

  • Junk WJ, Soares MGM, Bayley PB (2007) Freshwater fishes of the Amazon River basin: their biodiversity, fisheries, and habitats. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage 10(2):153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan IM, McCay BJ (2004) Cooperative research, co-management and the social dimension of fisheries science and management. Mar Policy 28(3):257–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King AJ, Tonkin Z, Lieschke J (2012) Short-term effects of a prolonged blackwater event on aquatic fauna in the Murray River, Australia: considerations for future events. Mar Freshw Res 63:576–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koed A, Birnie-Gauvin K, Sivebæk F, Aarestrup K (2020) From endangered to sustainable: Multi-faceted management in rivers and coasts improves Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations in Denmark. Fish Manage Ecol 27(1):64–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn JD (2015) Managing people, water, food and fish in the Murray-Darling Basin, southeastern Australia. Fish Manage Ecol 22:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn JD, Lintermans M (2012) A strategy to rehabilitate fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin, south-eastern Australia. Endangered Spec Res 16:165–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn JD, Lintermans M, Copeland C (2014) Laying the foundations for fish recovery: the first 10 years of the Native Fish Strategy for the Murray-Darling Basin. Aust Ecol Manag Rest 15(S1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konyole SO, Kinyuru JN, Owuor BO, Kenji GM, Onyango CA, Estambale BB, Friis H, Roos N, Owino VO (2012) Acceptability of amaranth grain-based nutritious complementary foods with dagaa fish (Rastrineobola Argentea) and edible termites (Macrotermes Subhylanus) compared to corn soy blend plus among young children/mothers dyads in Western Kenya. J Food Res 1(3)

  • Krueger C, Taylor W, Youn SJ (2019) From catastrophe to recovery: Stories of fishery management success. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kurien J, Javier LR (2013) Flavouring fish into food security. Report/Rapport: SF-FAO/2013/14. August/Aout 2013. FAO-SmartFish Programme of the Indian Ocean Commission, Ebene, Mauritius.

  • Leon LF, Lam DC, McCrimmon C, Swayne DA (2003) Watershed management modelling in Malawi: application and technology transfer. Environ Model Softw 18:531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard NJ, Fritsch MA, Fazio JD, Harrison J, Grover T (2015) The challenge of managing the Columbia River Basin for energy and fish. Fish Manage Ecol 22(1):88–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester RE, Webster IT, Fairweather PG, Young WJ (2011) Linking water-resource models to ecosystem-response models to guide water-resource planning—an example from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Mar Freshw Res 62:279–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Limuwa MM, Singini W, StorebakkenIs T (2018) Fish farming an illusion for lake Malawi Riparian communities under environmental changes? Sustainability 10:1453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintermans M (2007) Fishes of the murray-darling basin: an introductory guide. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission. 157 pp.

  • Lynch AJ, Cooke SJ, Deines A, Bower S, Bunnell DB, Cowx IG, Nguyen VM et al (2016) The social, economic, and ecological importance of inland fishes and fisheries. Environ Rev 24:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch AJ, Bartley DM, Beard TD Jr, Cowx IG, Funge-Smith S, Taylor WW, Cooke SJ (2020a) Examining progress towards achieving the ten steps of the rome declaration on responsible Inland fisheries. Fish Fish 21(1):190–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch AJ, Elliott V, Phang SC, Claussen JE, Harrison I, Murchie KJ, Steel EA, Stokes GL (2020b) Inland fish and fisheries integral to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat Sustain 3:579–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons RP, Scholz CA, Cohen AS, King JW, Brown ET, Ivory SJ, Johnson TC, Deino AL, Reinthal PN, McGlue MM, Blome MW (2015) Continuous 13-million-year record of East African hydroclimate, and implications for patterns of evolution and biodiversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(51):15568–15573. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512864112

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makawa Z, Kaunda E, Kapute E (2019) Wood utilization efficiency and acceptability of fried and smoked fish from lake Malawi. Afr J Food Agric Nutr Dev 19(2):14432–14457. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.85.17205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makwinja R, Kosamu I, Kaonga C (2019) Determinants and values of willingness to pay for water quality improvement: insights from Chia Lagoon. Malawi Sustainability 11(17):4690. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath DG, Cardoso A, Almeida OT, Pezzuti J (2008) Constructing a policy and institutional framework for an ecosystem-based approach to managing the Lower Amazon floodplain. Environ Dev Sustain 10:677–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-008-9154-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mekong River Commission (MRC) (2018) The Council Study WUP-FIN IWRM Scenario Modelling Report. Vientiane, Lao PDR.

  • Meyer WS (2005) The Irrigation Industry in the Murray and Murrumbidgee Basins. CRC for Irrigation Futures Technical Report No. 03/05. www.clw.csiro.au/ImageGallery/. Accessed 7 May 2019]

  • Ministry of Environment and Food (2019a) Order of the Fisheries and Fish Farming Act (Fisheries Act). Ministry of Environment and Food. LBK no 261 of 21/03/2019 https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=208281 (in Danish). Date of access: 05 Nov. 2019.

  • Ministry of Environment and Food (2019b) Order of the Act of Nature Protection. Ministry of Environment and Food. LBK no 240 of 13/03/2019. (in Danish) https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=207969 (Date of access: 05 Nov. 2019).

  • Murphy BF, Timbal B (2008) A review of recent climate variability and climate change in southeastern Australia. Int J Climatol 28:859–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray-Darling Basin Authority (2010) Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan: Overview. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority, p 262. www.download.mdba.gov.au/Guide_to_the_Basin_Plan_Volume_1_web.pdf. Accessed 20.06.19.

  • Murray–Darling Basin Authority (2011) Plain english summary of the proposed basin plan—including explanatory notes. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority, p 138. http://download.mdba.gov.au/proposed/plain_english_summary.pdf. Accessed 20.06.19

  • Murray–Darling Basin Authority (2020). Native Fish Recovery Strategy. Working Together for the Future of Native Fish. Murray-Darling Basin Authority, Canberra. https://www.mdba.gov.au/node/5971/. Accessed 23 June 2020.

  • Murray-Darling Basin Commission (2004) Native Fish Strategy for the Murray-Darling Basin 2003–2013. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission, p 64. http://www2.mdbc.gov.au/NFS.html Accessed 20.06.19.

  • Mussa H, Kaunda E, Chimatiro S, Banda L, Nankwenya B, Nyengere J (2017) Assessment of informal cross-border fish trade in the southern africa region: a case of Malawi and Zambia. J Agric Sci Technol 7:358–366. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6264/2017.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagoli J, Holvoet K, Remme M (2010) HIV and AIDS vulnerability in fishing communities in Mangochi district. Malawi African Journal of AIDS Research 9(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085906.2010.484575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308(5720):405–408. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Njaya F (2018) Ecosystem approach to fisheries in southern Lake Malawi: Status of the fisheries co-management. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage 21(2):159–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2018.1472504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble M, Duncan P, Perry D, Prospe K, Rose D, Schnierer S, Tipa G, William E, Woods R, Pittock J (2016) Culturally significant fisheries: keystones for management of freshwater social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 21(2):22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08353-210222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NPCC (Northwest Power and Conservation Council) (2014) Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Power and Conservation Council. https://www.nwcouncil.org/reports/2014-columbia-river-basin-fish-and-wildlife-program

  • NPCC (Northwest Power and Conservation Council) (2019a) 2018 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Costs Report—18th Annual Report to the Northwest Governors. Council Report 2019–5. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Power and Conservation Council. https://www.nwcouncil.org/sites/default/files/2019-5_0.pdf

  • NPCC (Northwest Power and Conservation Council) (2019b) Draft 2020 Addendum—Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program 2014. Council document 2019–6. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Power and Conservation Council. https://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/program/2018-amendments

  • Nunanará M, Onyango P, F (2015) Institutions and co-management in East African inland and Malawi fisheries: A critical perspective. World Dev 70:203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obiero KO, Abila RO, Njiru MJ, Raburu PO, Achieng AO, Kundu R, Lawrence T (2015) The challenges of management: Recent experiences in implementing fisheries co-management in Lake Victoria, Kenya. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 20:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr S, Pittock J, Chapagain A, Dumaresq D (2012) Dams on the Mekong River: Lost fish protein and the implications for land and water resources. Global Environ Chang 22(4):925–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Alder J, Bennett E, Christensen V, Tyedmers P, Watson R (2003) The future for fisheries. Science 302(5649):1359–1361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • PEB (Permanent Engineering Board) (2008) Columbia River treaty. Portland, Oregon: Columbia Basin Water Management Division, Civil Works and Management Directorate, Northwestern Division, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. http://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/PB/PEB_08/index.htm

  • Petersen TA, Brum SM, Rossoni F, Silveira GFV, Castello L (2016) Recovery of Arapaima sp. populations by community-based management in floodplains of the Purus River. Amazon J Fish Biol 89:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Palmer MA, Hart DD, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Rogers KH, Meyer JL, Stanford JA (2003) River flows and water wars: Emerging science for environmental decision making. Front Ecol Environ 1:298–306. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0298:RFAWWE]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid DD, Harris JH, Chapman DJ (1997) NSW Inland Commercial Fishery Data Analysis. FRDC Project No. 94/027. Sydney. http://www.frdc.com.au/Archived-Reports/FRDC Projects/1994–027-DLD.pdf. Accessed 20.06.19.

  • Reid AJ, Carlson AK, Creed IF, Eliason EJ, Gell PA, Johnson PT et al (2019) Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol Rev 94(3):849–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland SJ (2005) Overview of the history, fishery, biology and aquaculture of Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii peellii). In: Lintermans M, Phillips B (eds). Management of Murray Cod in the Murray-Darling Basin: Statement, Recommendations and Supporting Papers. 3–4 June 2004. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission and Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology, pp 38–61. http://publications.mdbc.gov.au/ Accessed 20.06.19.

  • Schwinn M, Baktoft H, Aarestrup K, Koed A (2019) Artificial lakes delay the migration of brown trout Salmo trutta smolts: a comparison of migratory behaviour in a stream and through an artificial lake. J Fish Biol 94(5):745–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skau JKH, Touch B, Chhoun C, Chea M, Unni US, Makurat J, Filteau S, Wieringa FT, Dijkhuizen MA, Ritz C, Wells JC, Berger J, Friis H, Michaelsen KF, Roos N (2015) Effects of animal source food and micronutrient fortification in complementary food products on body composition, iron status, and linear growth: a randomized trial in Cambodia. Am J Clin Nutr 101(4):742–751. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.114.084889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skov C, Berg S, Eigaard OR, Jessen TK, Skov PV (2019) Danish fisheries and aquaculture: past, present, and future. Fisheries 45(1):33–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith LED, Khoa SN, Lorenzen K (2005) Livelihood functions of inland fisheries: policy implications in developing countries. Water Policy 7:359–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Søndergaard M, Jeppsen E, Jensen JP (1999) Danish lakes and their restoration. TEMA-rapport fra DMU 24/1999. National Environmental Research Institute (in Danish).

  • State of Washington (1999) Statewide Strategy to Recover Salmon – Extinction is not an Option. Washington State Joint Resources Cabinet, September 21, 1999. Olympia, Washington. Available: https://www.digitalarchives.wa.gov/GovernorLocke/gsro/strategy/strategy.htm#long

  • State of Washington, State of Oregon, State of Idaho, United States, the Shoshone Bannock Tribes, the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, the Nez Perce Tribe, and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation (2018) 2018–2027 United States v. Oregon Management Agreement. United States v. Oregon, Civil No. 68–513-MO (D. Or.), Case 3:68-cv-00513-MO. https://www.fws.gov/lsnakecomplan/Reports/USvOregon/FINAL.2018-%202027%20USvOR%20Management%20Agreement%20with%20Signature%20Feb%202018%20.pdf

  • Taylor WW, Bartley DM, Goddard CI, Leonard NJ, Welcomme RL (Eds.). (2016) Freshwater, fish and the future: Proceedings of the global cross‐sectoral conference. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and Michigan State University.

  • Tenney J, Warf D, Tancreto N (2018) Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System, 1/1/2017–12/31/2017 Annual Report, 1990–080–00. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Portland, Oregon. https://www.ptagis.org/docs/default-source/ptagis-program-documents/2017-annual-report-project-1990-080-00.pdf?sfvrsn=2

  • TMT (Technical Management Team) (2003) Guidelines for Technical Management Team. http://pweb.crohms.org/tmt/documents/wmp/2006/guidelines.pdf

  • USBOR (United States Bureau of Reclamation) (1938) The Grand Coulee Dam and the Columbia Basin reclamation Project. United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation. Available https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015049235826&view=1up&seq=48

  • Venturelli PA, Hyder K, Skov C (2017) Angler apps as a source of recreational fisheries data: opportunities, challenges and proposed standards. Fish Fisheries 18(3):578–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo J (1895) A pesca na Amazônia. Livraria Classica de Alves, Rio de Janeiro

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vilain C, Baran E, Gallego G, Samadee S (2016) Fish and the nutrition of rural Cambodians. Asian J Agric Food Sci 4(1):26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer D, Shaad K, Souter NJ, Farrell T, Dudgeon D, Sullivan CA, Fauconnier I, MacDonald GM, McCartney MP, Power AG et al (2018) Integrating the social, hydrological and ecological dimensions of freshwater health: The Freshwater Health Index. Sci Total Environ 627:304–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden PS, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Reidy-Liermann C, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WDFW (Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife) (2018) Effective July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019 Washington Sport Fishing Rules. Olympia, Washington. Available https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/01998/wdfw01998.pdf (accessed July 7, 2019)

  • WDFW (Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife) (2011) Washington’s Fish & Wildlife Mean Business and Jobs. Olympia, Washington, available https://wdfw.wa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/01160/wdfw01160.pdf

  • Welcomme RL (2001) Inland Fisheries: conservation and management. Blackwells, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Welcomme RL (2011) An overview of global catch statistics for inland fish. ICES J Mar Sci 68:1751–1756. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsr035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welcomme RL, Cowx IG, Coates D, Béné C, Funge-Smith S, Halls A, Lorenzen K (2010) Inland capture fisheries. Phil Trans R Soc B 365(1554):2881–2896. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weyl OLF, Ribbink AJ, Tweddle D (2010) Lake Malawi: fishes, fisheries, biodiversity, health and Habitat. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage 13(3):241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JW, Primack RB (2019) Conservation Biology in Sub-Saharan Africa. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0177

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woods F (2008) The Columbia River Compact. Washington Attorney General’s Office, Olympia, WA.

  • World Bank (2012) Hidden harvest: the global contribution of capture fisheries. World Bank, Washington DC. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2012/05/18/000427087_20120518142913/Rendered/PDF/664690ESW0P1210120HiddenHarvest0web.pdf

  • Yakama Nation Fisheries (2019) STAR Project—Status and Trends of Fish and Habitat. http://dashboard.yakamafish-star.net/

  • Youn SJ, Taylor WW, Lynch AJ, Cowx IG, Beard TD Jr, Bartley D, Wu F (2014) Inland capture fishery contributions to global food security and threats to their future. Glob Food Sec 3(3):142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are members of the international InFish Research Network (http://infish.org/). Cooke, Kaunda, and Bartley are Robin Welcomme Fellows in Inland Fisheries at Michigan State University. Cooke is further supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Genome Canada. Nyboer is supported by a Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et Technologies grant from the Government of Quebec, Canada. Berg and Skov received funding from the Danish Rod and Net Fishing License Funds. We appreciate the input provided on an earlier draft of the Columbia River case study by Zachary Penney, Kate Self, Mike Matylewich, Matt Boyer, Bill Tweit, Tucker Jones, and Guy Norman. This manuscript has been internally reviewed by Bo Bunnell (Great Lakes Science Center) for the U.S. Geological Survey. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven J. Cooke.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cooke, S.J., Nyboer, E., Bennett, A. et al. The ten steps to responsible Inland fisheries in practice: reflections from diverse regional case studies around the globe. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 31, 843–877 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-021-09664-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-021-09664-w

Keywords

Navigation