Abstract
White-nose syndrome (WNS) has significantly impacted little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) (MYLU) populations in North America and continues to spread throughout the Pacific Northwest, posing a potential threat to populations in Alaska. Unfortunately, little is known about MYLU habitats in the coastal environments of the Northern Gulf of Alaska. It is imperative to fill this knowledge gap as the most fundamental information needed to direct research and conservation. To address this issue, we conducted a study to identify landscape features associated with MYLU foraging habitat and map its spatial distribution in the coastal zone (0–200 m above sea level) of the Kenai Peninsula. We collected a spatially explicit, stratified-random sample of MYLU foraging activity near waterbodies within six dominant landcover types using 24 automated recording devices. We used the machine learning algorithm, TreeNet, to identify important landcover features associated with the presence-absence of MYLU foraging locations and used these associations to generate a predictive model of MYLU foraging habitat across the entire coastal zone of the eastern Kenai Peninsula. Bats foraged in areas close to freshwater bodies with moderately sloped terrain along southwestern to north-facing aspects ≤ 50 m from conifer forests, and < 150 m from the coastline at elevations < 200 m. Foraging habitats were discontinuous, but extensively distributed as a patchwork along the coast. Our model highlights specific areas where strategic planning, research, and inter-agency and federal-Tribal collaborations can be made as we work proactively to confront WNS in the sub-Arctic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the repository, National Park Service (NPS) Integrated Resource Management Applications (IRMA) DataStore at https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2297313.
Change history
24 February 2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-023-03224-7
References
Adams RA (2010) Bat reproduction declines when conditions mimic climate change projections for western North America. Ecology 91:2437–2445
Ahlen I, Baagoe HJ, Bach L (2009) Behavior of Scandinavian bats during migration and foraging at sea. J Mammal 90:1318–1323
Alves DMCC, Terribile LC, Brito D (2014) The potential impact of white-nose syndrome on the conservation status of North American bats. PLoS ONE 9:e107395
Ancillotto L, Rydell J, Nardone V, Russo D (2014) Coastal cliffs on islands as foraging habitat for bats. Acta Chiropterol 16:103–108
Baltensperger AP, Huettmann F (2015) Predictive spatial niche and biodiversity hotspot models for small mammal communities in Alaska: applying machine-learning to conservation planning. Landscape Ecol 30:681–697
Barbet-Massin M, Frédéric J, Cécile HA, Wilfried T (2012) Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: How, where and how many? Methods Ecol Evol 3:327–338
Becker DJ, Albery GF, Sjodin AR, Poisot T et al (2022) Optimising predictive models to prioritise viral discovery in zoonotic reservoirs. Lancet Microbe 3:e625–e637
Bellante G, Boucher T, Charnon B, Goetz W, Homan K, Pan C, Pugh N, Megown K, Schrader B, Schulz B, Wittwer D (2020) Kenai Peninsula Existing Vegetation Map Project GTAC-10209-RPT1. Salt Lake City, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Geospatial Technology and Applications Center. 39 p
Blejwas KM (2014) Acoustic monitoring provides first records of Hoary Bats (Lasiurus cinereus) and delineates the distribution of Silver-haired Bats (Lasionycteris noctivagans) in Southeast Alaska. Northwest Nat 95:236–250
Blejwas KM, Pendleton GW, Kohan ML, Beard LO (2021) The Milieu Souterrain Superficiel as hibernation habitat for bats: implications for white-nose syndrome. J Mammal 102:1110–1127
Blejwas K, Beard L, Buchanan J, Lausen CL, Neubaum D, Tobin A, Weller TJ (2023) Could white-nose syndrome manifest differently in Myotis lucifugus in western versus eastern regions of North America? A review of factors. J Wildlife Dis 59:1–17
Boland JL, Smith WP, Hayes JP (2009) Survey of bats in Southeast Alaska with emphasis on Keen’s Myotis (Myotis keenii). Northwest Sci 83:169–179
Boshamer JPC, Bekker JP (2008) Nathusius’ pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii) and other species of bats on offshore platforms in the Dutch sector of the North Sea. Lutra 51:17–36
Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA (2002) Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model 157:279–298
Bradley AP (1997) The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recogn 30:1145–1159
Bridge TC, Huang Z, Przeslawski R, Tran M, Siwabessy J, Picard K, Reside AE, Logan M, Nichol SL, Caley MJ (2020) Transferable, predictive models of benthic communities informs marine spatial planning in a remote and data-poor region. Conserv Sci Pract 2:251
Burger PA (2020) Acoustic bat monitoring in Alaska national parks: 2016–2018. Natural Resource Report NPS/AKRO/NRR-2020/20096. National Park Service Fort Collins, CO. https://irma.npsgov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2272266
Clare EL, Barber BR, Sweeney BW, Hebert PDN, Fenton MB (2011) Eating local: influences of habitat on the diet of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). Mol Ecol 20:1772–1780
Crossland CJ, Baird D, Ducrotoy JP, Lindeboom H, Buddemeier RW, Dennison WC, Maxwell BA, Smith SV, Swaney DP (2005) The coastal zone—a domain of global interactions. Coastal fluxes in the Anthropocene: the land-ocean interactions in the coastal zone project of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. Heidelberg. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–37
Davy CM, Donaldson ME, Rico Y, Lausen CL, Dogantzis K, Ritchie K, Willis CK, Burles DW, Jung TS, McBurney S, Park A (2017) Correction: Prelude to a panzootic: Gene flow and immunogenetic variation in northern little brown myotis vulnerable to bat white-nose syndrome. Facets 2:733–733
Dobony CA, Johnson JB (2018) Observed resiliency of little brown myotis to long-term white-nose syndrome exposure. J Fish Wildl Manag 9:168–179
van den Driessche R, Mather M, Chatwin T (1999) Habitat selection by bats in temperate old-growth forests, Clayoquot Sound. British Columbia Proceedings of the Conference on the Biology and Management of Species and Habitats at Risk (Vol 1) BC Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. University College of the Cariboo. p313–319
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudik M, Ferrier S, Guisan A et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151
Faust JL (2018) Bat Activity and Distribution in Coastal Southcentral Alaska: Copper River Delta. Dissertation. University of Alaska Anchorage.
Ferrier S, Watson G, Pearce J, Drielsma M (2002) Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales. I Species-Level Modelling Biodivers Conserv 11:2275–2307
Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49
Frick WF, Pollock JF, Hicks AC, Langwig KE, Reynolds DS, Turner GG, Butchkoski CM, Kunz TH (2010) An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common North American bat species. Science 329:679–682
Friedman JH (2002) Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput Stat Data an 38:367–378
Gaulke SM, Cable AB, Hohoff TC, Rogness BA, Davis MA (2023) One model to rule them all: identifying priority bat habitats from multi-species habitat suitability models. J Wildlife Manage 87:e22351
George WJ (2021) Viral Surveillance and Genome Analysis of Bat Borne Viruses; Coronaviruses of Southcentral Alaskan Myotis. Dissertation. University of Alaska Anchorage.
Hatch SK, Connelly EE, Divoll TJ, Stenhouse IJ, Williams KA (2013) Offshore observations of eastern red bats (Lasiurus borealis) in the mid-Atlantic United States using multiple survey methods. PLoS ONE 8:e83803
Hayman DT, Pulliam JR, Marshall JC, Cryan PM, Webb CT (2016) Environment, host, and fungal traits predict continental-scale white-nose syndrome in bats. Sci Adv 2:e1500831
Hayward GD, Colt S, McTeague ML, Hollingsworth TN (2017) Climate change vulnerability assessment for the Chugach National Forest and the Kenai Peninsula General Technical Report-Pacific. Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service (PNW-GTR-950)
Henry M, Thomas DW, Vaudry R, Carrier M (2002) Foraging distances and home range of pregnant and lactating little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). J Mammal 83:767–774
Hoyt JR, Kilpatrick AM, Langwig KE (2021) Ecology and impacts of white-nose syndrome on bats. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:196–210
Jung TS, Blejwas KM, Lausen CL, Wilson JM, Olson LE (2014) Concluding remarks: what do we need to know about bats in northwestern North America? Northwest Nat 95:318–330
Kellner AME, Harestad AS (2005) Diets of bats in coastal rainforests on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Northwest Nat 86:45–48
Kramer AM, Mercier A, Maher S, Kumi-Ansu Y, Bowden S, Drake JM (2021) Spatial spread of white-nose syndrome in North America 2006–2018. Integr Biol 7:1487
Kunz TH, Reichard JD (2010) Status review of the little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) and determination that immediate listing under the Endangered Species Act is scientifically and legally warranted. Boston University, Boston
Laine VN, Lilley TM, Norrdahl K, Primmer CR (2013) Population genetics of the Daubenton’s bat (Myotis daubentoniid) in the Archipelago Sea, SW Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 50:303–315
Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX, Hosmer DW Jr (2013) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley, Sons
Lewis SW (1997) October Roosting and hibernal ecology of bats in southeast Alaska’s karstlands. In 1997 Karst and cave management symposium: 13th national cave management symposium, highlighting forest karst ecosystems, October 7–10, 1997. Bellingham, WA. pp 9
Lissovsky AA, Dudov SV, Obolenskaya EV (2021) Species-distribution modeling: advantages and limitations of its application. 1 General approaches. Biol Bull 11:254–264
Loeb et al. (2015) A plan for the North American bat monitoring program (NABat). Gen Tech Rep SRS-208 US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. Asheville, NC. 208:1-100
Loeb SC, Winters EA (2014) Observations of little brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus) habitat associations and activity in the Chugach National Forest, Alaska. Northwest Nat 95:264–276
Lorch JM, Palmer JM, Lindner DL, Ballmann AE, George KG, Griffin K, Knowles S, Huckabee JR, Haman KH, Anderson CD, Becker PA (2016) First detection of bat white-nose syndrome in western North America. Msphere 1:10–1128
Lunde RE, Harestad AS (1986) Activity of little brown bats in coastal forests. Northwest Sci 60:206–209
Lynn H, Mohler CL, DeGloria SD, McCulloch CE (1995) Error assessment in decision-tree models applied to vegetation analysis. Landscape Ecol 10:323–335
Magness DR, Morton JM (2018) Using climate envelope models to identify potential ecological trajectories on the Kenai Peninsula. AlaskaPloS One 13:e0208883
Maher SP, Kramer AM, Zokan PJT, MA, Bowden SE Barton HD, Magori K, Drake JM, (2012) Spread of white-nose syndrome on a network regulated by geography and climate. Nat Commun 3:1306
Manly BJF, McDonald LL, Thomas DL (1993) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Chapman Hall, London
Marzban C (2004) The ROC curve and the area under it as performance measures. Weather Forecast 19:1106–1114
McClure ML, Hranac CR, Haase CG, McGinnis S, Dickson BG, Hayman DT, McGuire LP, Lausen CL, Plowright RK, Fuller N, Olson SH (2022) Projecting the compound effects of climate change and white-nose syndrome on North American bat species. Clim Chang Ecol 3:100047
Meyer AD, Stevens DF, Blackwood JC (2016) Predicting bat colony survival under controls targeting multiple transmission routes of white-nose syndrome. J Theor Biol 409:60–69
Mizumoto A (2023) Calculating the relative importance of multiple regression predictor variables using dominance analysis and random forests. Lang Learn 73:161–196
Mullet TC, Burger P, Griffin K (2021) Bats transit and forage over nearshore environments in the northern Gulf of Alaska. Northwest Nat 102:150–156
Nelson JJ, Gillam EH (2017) Selection of foraging habitat by female little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus). J Mammal 98:222–231
Nowacki GJ, Spencer P, Fleming M, Brock T, Jorgenson T (2003) Unified ecoregions of Alaska: 2001(No 02–297) US Geological Survey. https://www.usgs.gov/centers/asc/science/ alaska-ecoregions-mapping?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-scien ce_center_objects. Accessed 31 July 2023
O’Keefe JM, Pettit JL, Loeb SC, Stiver WH (2019) White-nose syndrome dramatically altered the summer bat assemblage in a temperate southern Appalachian forest. Mamm Biol 98:146–153
Parker DI, Lawhead BE, Cook JA (1997) Distributional limits of bats in Alaska. Arctic 50:256–265
Powers KE, Reynolds RJ, Orndorff W, Ford WM, Hobson CS (2015) Post-white-nose syndrome trends in Virginia’s cave bats, 2008–2013. J Ecol Nat Environ 7:113–123
Randall LA (2014) Roost-site selection and movements of little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) in southwestern Yukon. Northwest Nat 95:312–317
Reichert B, Lausen C, Loeb S, Weller T, Allen R, Britzke E, Hohoff T, Siemers J, Burkholder B, Herzog C, Verant M (2018)A guide to processing bat acoustic data for the North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat) (No 2018–1068) US Geological Survey. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20181068. Accessed 31 July 2023
Rodríguez JP, Brotons L, Bustamante J, Seoane J (2007) The application of predictive modelling of species distribution to biodiversity conservation. Divers Distrib 13:243–251
Rydell J, McNeill DP, Eklöf J (2002) Capture success of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) feeding on mosquitoes. J Zool 256:379–381
Santos H, Rodrigues L, Jones G, Rebelo H (2013) Using species distribution modelling to predict bat fatality risk at wind farms. Biol Conserv 157:178–186
Sherwin HA, Montgomery WI, Lundy MG (2013) The impact and implications of climate change for bats. Mammal Rev 43:171–182
Shively R, Barboza P (2017) Range and roosting ecology of the little brown bat, myotis lucifugus, in interior and northern Alaska. Northwest Nat 98:122–131
Shively R, Barboza P, Doak P, Jung TS (2018) Increased diet breadth of little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) at their northern range limit: a multimethod approach. Can J Zool 96:31–38
Shively R (2016) Diet and habitat of the little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) in interior and northern Alaska. Dissertation. University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska
Talbert C, Reichert B (2018) Attributed North American Bat Monitoring Program (NABat) Master Sample and Grid-Based Sampling Frame. US Geological Survey. Fort Collins Science Center. https://www.usgs.gov/data/attributed-north-american-bat-monitoring-program-nabat-master-sample-and-grid-based-sampling. Accessed 31 July 2023
Tan SH, Tan SB (2010) The correct interpretation of confidence intervals. Proc Singap 19:276–278
Tessler DF, Snively ML (2014) New insights on the distribution, ecology, and overwintering behavior of the Little Brown Myotis (Myotis lucifugus) in Alaska. Northwest Nat 95:251–263
US Fish and Wildlife Service (2020b) FAQ: Where is WNS Now? https://www.whitenosesyndromeorg/where-is-wns. Accessed 31 July 2023
US Fish Wildlife Service (2020a) FAQ: How Many Bats Has White-nose Syndrome Killed? https://www.whitenosesyndromeorg/faq/how-many-bats-has-white-nose-syndromekilled. Accessed 31 July 2023
Vanderwolf KJ, McAlpine DF (2021) Hibernacula microclimate and declines in overwintering bats during an outbreak of white-nose syndrome near the northern range limit of infection in North America. Ecol Evol 11:2273–2288
Wood KA, Stillman RA, Hilton GM (2018) Conservation in a changing world needs predictive models. Anim Conserv 21:87–88
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Park Service White Nose Syndrome advisory committee for funding this project. We appreciate the support and work ethic of the KEFJ administrative staff and M/V Serac boat crews. We give a special thank you to the exceptional field work of M. Petschauer and S. Kirlin, and the gracious support of A. Jarosz from Chugach Regional Resource Commission. Minitab, LLC. Technical Support team helped us understand the new TreeNet platform for building and predicting our model output. We very much appreciate the two anonymous reviewers and editor for helping us improve this manuscript. The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of any government agencies. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. TCM contributed to project conception, funding and equipment acquisition, budgeting, planning, field staff hiring and supervision, methods development, coordination and implementation of field data collection, data management, data analysis, modeling, and writing this manuscript. PB contributed to funding acquisition, field data collection, data management, data analysis, and revising this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The results presented in this manuscript were acquired from work funded by the U.S. National Park Service (PMIS 245426 and PMIS 254496) for the purpose of filling data gaps on bats inhabiting national parks in Alaska in the context of white-nose syndrome. Field work was conducted by the National Park Service and Chugach Regional Resource Commission. We declare that there are no competing or conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: Under the heading “Sample site selection”, in third paragraph, the text “503-m minimum foraging distance Randall (2014)” was replaced with “650-m intermediate foraging distance Henry et al. (2002)”. Under the heading “Data analysis”, the text “503-m” was replaced with “650-m”. Under the heading “Model assumptions” the third point, the text “503 m” was replaced with “650 m”.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mullet, T.C., Burger, P. Landscape predictors and spatial distribution of little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) coastal foraging habitat along the Northern Gulf of Alaska. Polar Biol 46, 1203–1213 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-023-03194-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-023-03194-w