Soil cone index and bulk density of a sandy loam under no-till and conventional tillage in a corn-soybean rotation☆
Introduction
Tillage may considerably influence soil physical properties, plant growth and crop productivity. Soil compaction is the reduction in total volume and macroporosity due to driving heavy farm equipment on wet soils (Jabro et al., 2014). Compaction caused by field operations and wheel traffic from heavy machinery is an acknowledged problem worldwide (Lal and Shukla, 2004; Nawaz et al., 2013; Antille et al., 2019) and may occur during various farming activities (Jabro et al., 2014; Tulberg et al., 2019).
In recent years, soil compaction due to farming operations has also been recognized as a form of soil degradation by farmers in the northern Great Plains (Jabro et al., 2014). Compacted soils restrict water movement, cause water and nutrient stress, slow seedling emergence, decrease root growth, development and penetration into the subsoil, and reduce plant growth, which results in decreased crop yield (Hakansson and Reeder, 1994; Hamza and Anderson, 2005; Lal and Shukla, 2004; Hyatt et al., 2007; Jabro et al., 2014, 2015). Previous research showed that soil compaction could reduce yield up to 50 % in some areas depending on the depth and level of compaction (Lal and Shukla, 2004; Sidhu and Duiker, 2006). There are 68.3 million hectares of compacted soils affected by farm machinery traffic alone worldwide (Nawaz et al., 2013). The adoption of better farming practices that minimize soil compaction is essential for sustaining crop productivity while maintaining environmental quality and soil health.
Soil penetration resistance expressed as the cone index, an indicator of compaction, which has been used to characterize tillage-induced changes in soil strength as a function of depth. The common tool to quantify the cone index of soils in the field is using a sensor-based cone penetrometer (Kogelbauer et al., 2013), which is a direct mechanical indicator to measure the depth and level of soil compaction, and is mainly impacted by moisture content, bulk density and type of soil (Jabro et al., 2015). A cone index of 2 MPa and larger can potentially restrict water movement and impede root growth and depth through soil profile (Taylor and Gardner, 1963).
To date, the effect of tillage on soil strength and bulk density is still unclear. Generally, tillage practices reduced soil strength and bulk density (Jabro et al., 2016; Celik, 2011). Others concluded that no differences in soil penetration resistance and bulk density were found among tillage systems (Carefoot et al., 1990; Ferreras et al., 2000; Hao et al., 1987; Afzalinia and Zabihi., 2014). Other studies showed that soil strength and bulk density increased in reduced tillage and no-tillage practices compared to conventionally tilled systems (Steyn et al., 1995; Celik, 2011; Jabro et al., 2014, 2016; Oduma et al., 2017; Blanco-Canqui and Ruis, 2018). However, Pikul and Asae (1995); Amuri and Brye (2008) indicated that soil bulk density decreased under no-till due to an increase in amounts of residue and organic matter.
Hammel (1989) observed that bulk density measurements in the top 30 cm of silt loam were higher with zero tillage than minimum tillage or conventional tillage, who also found that soil penetration resistance was greater in the top 25 cm in minimum tillage than conventional tillage. Mahboubi et al. (1993); Afzalinia and Zabihi (2014); Jabro et al. (2015, 2016) reported greater soil strength and bulk density in no-till than conventional tillage. Hussain et al. (1998) observed higher soil bulk density and moisture content under no-till system than under conventional tillage due to greater crop residues at the soil surface and lower proportion of soil macropores. Anken et al. (2004) found that tillage did not affect soil bulk density after 14 years of tillage management practices. Meanwhile, conventional tillage decreased soil strength and bulk density in a clayey soil under semi-arid conditions (Celik, 2011).
The uncertainty of these research findings suggests the necessity for additional studies; therefore, a long-term study was carried out to evaluate the effect of no-till (NT) and conventional tillage (CT) systems in an irrigated corn-soybean rotation on soil cone index (CI), bulk density (ρb) and gravimetric moisture content (θm) in sandy loam soil.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The study was conducted from 2013 to 2019 at the irrigated research farm in western North Dakota (48.1640 N, 103.0986 W) ND, USA. The soil at the research site is classified as Lihen sandy loam (sandy, mixed, frigid Entic Haplustoll), with nearly level topography of 0–2 % slope. Amounts of sand, silt, and clay were 66.5, 16.0, and 17.5 % for the 0−30-cm layer (Jabro et al., 2016).
Research plots were arranged as a split-plot of rotation and tillage treatments in a randomized complete block
Results and discussion
Since there were no significant differences in soil cone index (CI) measurements between after planting and post-harvest, only after planting CI measurements were included in this manuscript.
The results of the analysis of variance for the top 0–30 cm depth, showed that soil CI and bulk density (ρb) were significantly affected by year and tillage. The gravimetric water content (θm) was significantly affected by year and crop. Interactions were not significant for all three parameters (Table 1).
Summary and conclusions
Based on the results of this study, no-till (NT) tended to increase soil cone index (CI) and bulk density (ρb) in the top 0–30 cm layer compared with conventional tillage (CT) practices under both corn and soybean over seven years in corn-soybean rotation. Smaller CI and ρb measurements in CT were related to maximum soil disturbance produced by intensive tillage and incorporation of crop residues into the surface layer.
Overall, the NT system resulted in similar or slightly lower water content (θ
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Dale Spracklin at the Northern Plain Agricultural Research Lab in Sidney, MT, USA for his help with collecting data and managing the experiment.
References (41)
- et al.
Soil compaction variation during corn growing season under conservation tillage
Soil Till. Res.
(2014) - et al.
Long-term tillage system effects under moist cool conditions in Switzerland
Soil Till. Res.
(2004) - et al.
No-tillage and soil physical environment
Geoderma
(2018) - et al.
Soil bulk density and crop yield under eleven consecutive years of corn with different tillage and residue practices in a sandy loam soil in central Canada
Soil Till. Res.
(2005) - et al.
Effect of no-tillage on some soils physical properties of a structural degraded petrocalcic paleudoll of southern “Pampa” of Argentina
Soil Till. Res.
(2000) - et al.
Subsoil compaction by vehicles with high axle load-extent, persistence and crop response
Soil Till. Res.
(1994) - et al.
Soil compaction in cropping systems: a review of the nature, causes and possible solutions
Soil Till. Res.
(2005) - et al.
Tillage effect on corn emergence rates
Soil Till. Res.
(1993) - et al.
Physical and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam soil under zero, shallow and deep tillage practices
Soil Till. Res.
(2016) - et al.
Soil physical properties and wheat root growth as affected by no-tillage and conventional tillage systems in a Mediterranean environment of Chile
Soil Till. Res.
(2008)
Short-term effects of four tillage practices on soil physical properties, soil water potential, and maize yield
Geoderma
Residue management practice effects on soil penetration resistance in a wheat-soybean double-crop production system
Soil Sci.
Review: soil compaction and controlled traffic farming in arable and grass cropping systems
Agron. Res.
Predicting soil density using cone penetration resistance and moisture profile
ASAE Trans.
Moisture and density effects on cone index
ASAE Trans.
Bulk Density. In Klute, ed. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I- Physical and Mineralogical Methods
Tillage-induced soil changes and related grain yield in a semi-arid region
Can. J. Soil Sci.
Effects of tillage methods on penetration resistance, bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity in a clayey soil conditions
J. of Agricultural Science
The effects of tillage systems and crop sequences on bulk density and penetration resistance on a clay soil in southern Saskatchewan
Can. J. Soil Sci.
Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on bulk density and soil impedance in Northern Idaho
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
Cited by (30)
Increased topsoil depth required to support increased grain yield production in high density maize
2024, Field Crops ResearchSustainability assessment of corn production in conventional and conservation tillage systems
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionSoil-water characteristic curves and their estimated hydraulic parameters in no-tilled and conventionally tilled soils
2022, Soil and Tillage ResearchCitation Excerpt :Mean and coefficient of variation (CV %) results of particle size distribution for the 0–90 cm soil profile are given in Table 1. The soil structure ranged between weak fine platy to massive or single grain in the A-horizon (Jabro et al., 2021). Research plots for the original cropping systems study were arranged as a split-plot of rotation and tillage treatments in a randomized complete block design with each phase of the rotation and tillage present each year.
Yield and yield components of maize and soil physical properties as affected by tillage practices and organic mulching
2021, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
- ☆
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by USDA. The USDA is an equal opportunity employer.